Today, there's not necessarily anything wrong with this, I only think that writers who are doing this are passing up on potential traffic and/or customers. Such resource boxes will only benefit their site ratings in a...
I run an article directory on my site, and I'm seeing a growing amount of articles being presented, only for the backlink given in the Resource Box. This is probably as a result of increasing amount of PLR articles and material that's becoming available.
Today, there is not necessarily anything wrong with this, I only think that authors who are doing this are missing possible traffic and/or consumers. Such reference boxes is only going to benefit their site rankings in incoming links that are valued by any search engine.
Is this a bad thing? No. Where they're losing out is as follows.
Much of the traffic to my report directory comes from search engines, by people searching for info on a particular subject. Today, this user types in their key-words, clicks on the search field, and is given a summary of relevant sites. They selected one, and are taken to the author's article. We found out about http://linklicious.me/ by searching the Internet. They read the article about, say, snowboarding, feel 'This is interesting' and go to the author's reference field at the conclusion of the article to see what else they've to say on this subject. Learn more on this partner portfolio - Click here: linklicious works. There, they look for a link to some site promotion cellular ringtones. If you have an opinion about religion, you will maybe desire to compare about linklicious fiverr. May be the audience likely to be impressed, or interested in this? Not so likely. They wish to learn about snowboarding, not modify their phone. I believe among three things will happen then:
The reader leaves the whole site in disgust.
The reader clicks on the link to some relevant report.
The reader clicks on the related Google Ad-sense (or similar contextual promotion) offer.
They don't click the author's reference link. That's a potential consumer lost, quite probably for good.
Yes, put a link in to your site in the reference field, but many article websites allow many links, so for goodness sake put a link in that' ;s associated with the article subject as well, and ultimately put it in first, before you lose the customer.
'But my site doesn't have such a thing related to that matter onto it'!
You can add a thing that does. Add a report index, and have the reference box saying 'To read more articles on this issue, click here.' Add a web directory, and have the written text say 'To look at links to sites on this issue, click here.' Or just head to ClickBank, search for related jobs, and have a link to them, using the link saying something like 'If you prefer to learn more on this issue, purchase this product.' Ideally, not a direct url to the item, but a cloaked or redirected one.
Using this method, you still get that connect to your site that you were after initially, but, furthermore, you've the opportunity to earn money from the reader in a fresh way. A win-win situation. Plus, you don't seem like somebody just submitting acquired information on any subject only for the sake of the backlink it will give you. A much more professional look. Is not it worth taking the time to create better use of one's reference field?.
No comments:
Post a Comment